Literature Detail
|
Kusumi, Junko; Tsumura, Yoshihiko PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS IN TAXODIACEAE AND CUPRESSACEAE SENSU STRICTO BASED ON MATK GENE, CHLL GENE, TRNL-TRNF IGS REGION, AND TRNL INTRON SEQUENCES Nucleotide sequences from four chloroplast genes, the matK, chlL, intergenic spacer (IGS) region between trnL and trnF, and an intron of trnL, were determined from all species of Taxodiaceae and five species of Cupressaceae sensu stricto (s.s.). Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the maximum parsimony and the neighbor-joining methods with Cunninghamia as an outgroup. These analyses provided greater resolution of relationships among genera and higher bootstrap supports for clades compared to previous analyses. Results indicate that Taiwania diverged first, and then Athrotaxis diverged from the remaining genera. Metasequoia, Sequoia, and Sequoiadendron form a clade. Taxodium and Glyptostrobus form a clade, which is the sister to Cryptomeria. Cupressaceae s.s. are derived from within Taxodiaceae, being the most closely related to the Cryptomerial/Taxodium/Glyptostrobus clade. These relationships are consistent with previous morphological groupings and the analyses of other molecular data. In addition, we found acceleration of evolutionary rates in Cupressaceae s.s. Possible causes for the acceleration are discussed. Pubmed ID: 11034923 Keywords: Larix chinensisMLarix chinensisELarix chinensisTLarix chinensisALarix chinensisSLarix chinensisELarix chinensisQLarix chinensisULarix chinensisOLarix chinensisILarix chinensisALarix chinensis, Larix chinensisGLarix chinensisLLarix chinensisYLarix chinensisPLarix chinensisTLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisSLarix chinensisTLarix chinensisRLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisBLarix chinensisULarix chinensisSLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisCLarix chinensisRLarix chinensisYLarix chinensisPLarix chinensisTLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisMLarix chinensisELarix chinensisRLarix chinensisILarix chinensisALarix chinensis, Larix chinensisALarix chinensisTLarix chinensisHLarix chinensisRLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisTLarix chinensisALarix chinensisXLarix chinensisILarix chinensisSLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisTLarix chinensisALarix chinensisXLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisDLarix chinensisILarix chinensisULarix chinensisMLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisNLarix chinensisULarix chinensisCLarix chinensisLLarix chinensisELarix chinensisOLarix chinensisTLarix chinensisILarix chinensisDLarix chinensisELarix chinensis, Larix chinensisSLarix chinensisELarix chinensisQLarix chinensisULarix chinensisOLarix chinensisILarix chinensisALarix chinensis, Larix chinensisCLarix chinensisULarix chinensisNLarix chinensisNLarix chinensisILarix chinensisNLarix chinensisGLarix chinensisHLarix chinensisALarix chinensisMLarix chinensisILarix chinensisALarix chinensis, Larix chinensisSLarix chinensisELarix chinensisQLarix chinensisULarix chinensisOLarix chinensisILarix chinensisALarix chinensisDLarix chinensisELarix chinensisNLarix chinensisDLarix chinensisRLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisNLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisCLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisNLarix chinensisILarix chinensisFLarix chinensisELarix chinensisRLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisTLarix chinensisALarix chinensisILarix chinensisWLarix chinensisALarix chinensisNLarix chinensisILarix chinensisALarix chinensis American Journal of Botany, 2000; Vol 87(10) : 1480 - 1488 |


