Home | Site Map | Site Stats | Contact Us

Welcome to the Dendrome Project!

Icon 05 TreeGenes

Sequence Resources

Summary by Genus

Colleague Directory

Colleagues Organizations

Species Database

Forest Trees

Literature Database

Search Literature

Transcriptome Database

Search Transcriptome Transcriptome Summary

Protein Database

Search Proteins Protein Summary

Expression Studies

Search Expression Expr. Studies Summary

DiversiTree

Genotype, Phenotype and Sequence CartograTree

Comparative Mapping Database

Published Maps Maps Recently Submitted Search Cmap

Genome Transcriptome Browser

GBrowse Portal

Submissions

Submit to TreeGenes

Icon 03 Updates

PineRefSeq project releases assembly (v0.8) of the Pinus teada genome | CartograTree (v2.0.0), a map interface that works with DiversiTree to bring together genomics, ecological, and trait data is now live! | SMarTForests Project releases the first assembly (v1.0) of the Picea glauca genome |

|


Literature Detail

SantamarĂ­a, O; Smith, D R; Stanosz, G R

INTERACTION BETWEEN DIPLODIA PINEA AND D. SCROBICULATA IN RED AND JACK PINE SEEDLINGS.

Sphaeropsis sapinea sensu lato is a conifer fungal pathogen that causes shoot blight and stem cankers. Recently, the former S. sapinea has been divided into two species, Diplodia pinea and D. scrobiculata. The aims of the study were to determine the contribution of each species in disease development on red and jack pines by means of co-inoculations and molecular identifications, and to evaluate how the presence of each species affects the development and aggressiveness of the other. Symptom severity (distance below the inoculation site at which necrotic needles were observed) and identification length (the maximum distance from inoculation site from which either D. pinea or D. scrobiculata was identified using molecular methods) were recorded 4 weeks after inoculating wounded seedlings with agar plugs colonized by these pathogens. The results suggested that D. pinea was much more aggressive on both hosts than D. scrobiculata. When a seedling was co-inoculated with these pathogens, the symptom development appeared to be mainly due to D. pinea. The presence of D. pinea also interfered with the establishment of D. scrobiculata in the plant tissue. However, D. scrobiculata showed antagonism toward D. pinea. When both pathogens co-occurred in a single seedling, symptom severity caused by D. pinea was less than when D. pinea alone was present.

Pubmed ID: 20955080

Keywords: Larix chinensisPLarix chinensisILarix chinensisNLarix chinensisULarix chinensisSLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisDLarix chinensisNLarix chinensisALarix chinensis,Larix chinensis Larix chinensisFLarix chinensisULarix chinensisNLarix chinensisGLarix chinensisALarix chinensisLLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisALarix chinensisNLarix chinensisTLarix chinensisILarix chinensisBLarix chinensisILarix chinensisOLarix chinensisSLarix chinensisILarix chinensisSLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisILarix chinensisSLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisLLarix chinensisALarix chinensisTLarix chinensisILarix chinensisOLarix chinensisNLarix chinensis Larix chinensis&Larix chinensis Larix chinensisPLarix chinensisULarix chinensisRLarix chinensisILarix chinensisFLarix chinensisILarix chinensisCLarix chinensisALarix chinensisTLarix chinensisILarix chinensisOLarix chinensisNLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisSLarix chinensisELarix chinensisELarix chinensisDLarix chinensisLLarix chinensisILarix chinensisNLarix chinensisGLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisPLarix chinensisALarix chinensisTLarix chinensisHLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisGLarix chinensisELarix chinensisNLarix chinensisILarix chinensisCLarix chinensisILarix chinensisTLarix chinensisYLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisELarix chinensisTLarix chinensisILarix chinensisOLarix chinensisLLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisGLarix chinensisYLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisGLarix chinensisELarix chinensisNLarix chinensisELarix chinensisTLarix chinensisILarix chinensisCLarix chinensisSLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisPLarix chinensisLLarix chinensisALarix chinensisNLarix chinensisTLarix chinensis Larix chinensisDLarix chinensisILarix chinensisSLarix chinensisELarix chinensisALarix chinensisSLarix chinensisELarix chinensisSLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisALarix chinensisNLarix chinensisALarix chinensisLLarix chinensisYLarix chinensisSLarix chinensisILarix chinensisSLarix chinensis Larix chinensisOLarix chinensisFLarix chinensis Larix chinensisVLarix chinensisALarix chinensisRLarix chinensisILarix chinensisALarix chinensisNLarix chinensisCLarix chinensisELarix chinensis, Larix chinensisMLarix chinensisILarix chinensisCLarix chinensisRLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisBLarix chinensisILarix chinensisOLarix chinensisLLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisGLarix chinensisYLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisALarix chinensisSLarix chinensisCLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisMLarix chinensisYLarix chinensisCLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisTLarix chinensisALarix chinensis, Larix chinensisGLarix chinensisELarix chinensisNLarix chinensisELarix chinensisTLarix chinensisILarix chinensisCLarix chinensis Larix chinensisMLarix chinensisALarix chinensisRLarix chinensisKLarix chinensisELarix chinensisRLarix chinensisSLarix chinensis

Phytopathology, 2011; Vol 101(3) : 334 - 339