Literature Detail
|
Bogunić, F; Siljak-Yakovlev, S; Muratović, E; Ballian, D DIFFERENT KARYOTYPE PATTERNS AMONG ALLOPATRIC PINUS NIGRA (PINACEAE) POPULATIONS REVEALED BY MOLECULAR CYTOGENETICS. To examine variation and taxonomic recognition of Pinus nigra (European black pine) at the intraspecific level, chromosomal distribution of 5S and 18S-5.8S-26S rDNA loci revealed by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) and fluorochrome banding with chromomycin A(3) and DAPI were analysed among allopatric populations belonging to different subspecies. Despite prevalent opinion on predominantly conserved and homogenous conifer karyotypes, several patterns were observed. Surprisingly, interstitial 18S rDNA loci and DAPI heterochromatin staining after FISH showed variations in distribution and localisation. Three subspecies shared a pattern with nine 18S rDNA loci (ssp. nigra, pallasiana and laricio) while ssp. dalmatica and salzmannii had eight rDNA loci. DAPI banding displayed two patterns, one with a high number of signals (ssp. nigra, pallasiana and dalmatica) and the other with a lower number of signals (ssp. salzmannii and laricio). We conclude that our results cannot provide proof for either classification scheme for the P. nigra complex, but rather demonstrate the variability of different heterochromatin fractions at the intraspecific level. Pubmed ID: 21143741 Keywords: Larix chinensisPLarix chinensisILarix chinensisNLarix chinensisULarix chinensisSLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisCLarix chinensisHLarix chinensisRLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisMLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisSLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisMLarix chinensisELarix chinensisSLarix chinensis,Larix chinensis Larix chinensisPLarix chinensisLLarix chinensisALarix chinensisNLarix chinensisTLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisGLarix chinensisELarix chinensisNLarix chinensisELarix chinensisTLarix chinensisILarix chinensisCLarix chinensis Larix chinensisLLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisCLarix chinensisILarix chinensis, Larix chinensisKLarix chinensisALarix chinensisRLarix chinensisYLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisTLarix chinensisYLarix chinensisPLarix chinensisILarix chinensisNLarix chinensisGLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisALarix chinensisFLarix chinensisRLarix chinensisILarix chinensisCLarix chinensisALarix chinensis,Larix chinensis Larix chinensisNLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisRLarix chinensisTLarix chinensisHLarix chinensisELarix chinensisRLarix chinensisNLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisCLarix chinensisYLarix chinensisTLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisGLarix chinensisELarix chinensisNLarix chinensisELarix chinensisTLarix chinensisILarix chinensisCLarix chinensis Larix chinensisALarix chinensisNLarix chinensisALarix chinensisLLarix chinensisYLarix chinensisSLarix chinensisILarix chinensisSLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisDLarix chinensisNLarix chinensisALarix chinensis,Larix chinensis Larix chinensisRLarix chinensisILarix chinensisBLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisSLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisMLarix chinensisALarix chinensisLLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisGLarix chinensisELarix chinensisNLarix chinensisELarix chinensisTLarix chinensisILarix chinensisCLarix chinensisSLarix chinensis, Larix chinensisELarix chinensisULarix chinensisRLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisPLarix chinensisELarix chinensis, Larix chinensisGLarix chinensisELarix chinensisNLarix chinensisELarix chinensisTLarix chinensisILarix chinensisCLarix chinensisSLarix chinensis,Larix chinensis Larix chinensisPLarix chinensisOLarix chinensisPLarix chinensisULarix chinensisLLarix chinensisALarix chinensisTLarix chinensisILarix chinensisOLarix chinensisNLarix chinensis Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2011; Vol 13(1) : 194 - 200 |

