HomeOverviewmembersPublicationsNeale Lab

Spring Bud Flush Traits Analyzed

Table 1 Description of spring bud flush trait, year of measurement, and name of the trait analyzed.

Washington Site (na = 190)

Trait Description

Year

Trait Name

lateral bud flush

1995

wlat95

lateral bud flush

1996

wlat96

lateral bud flush

1997

wlat97

terminal bud flush

1995

wter95

terminal bud flush

1996

wter96

terminal bud flush

1997

wter97

bud flush

1998

wflu98


Oregon Site (n = 78)

Trait Description

Year

Trait Name

lateral bud flush

1995

olat95

lateral bud flush

1996

olat96

terminal bud flush

1995

oter95

terminal bud flush

1996

oter96

bud flush

1998

oflu98


QTL x year and QTL x site interaction analyses

Trait Description

Year(s)

Trait Name

Washington year interaction b

1995, 1996

yearWA

Oregon year interaction c

1995, 1996

yearOR

Site interaction d

1995

site95

Site interaction e

1996

site96

Site interaction f

1998

site98


a number of clones in sample
b wter95 and wter96 data included in analysis; n = 190
c oter95 and oter96 data included in analysis; n = 78
d oter95 and wter95 data included in analysis; n = 78
e oter96 and wter96 data included in analysis; n = 78
f oflu98 and wflu98 data included in analysis; n = 78
QTL Models Used in Analysis
1 versus 0 QTL

Table 4 Bud flush QTLs detected following 1 versus 0 QTL model. Linkage group (LG) and map position (cM) are presented for each QTL along with F-values, paternal and maternal effects, paternal x maternal interaction effects, and the proportion of total phenotypic variance explained by the QTL. Standard errors for effects are presented in parentheses. (See Table 1 for description of trait names.)

Washington Site

Trait

LG

Map Position (cM)

F-value

Pat. Effect (Std. Error)

Mat. Effect (Std. Error)

Pat. X Mat. Effect (Std. Error)

Proportion Var. (%)

wlat95

3

45

4.71 **

-0.09 (0.03)

0.01 (0.03)

0.01 (0.03)

5.6

wlat95

4

89

5.70 **

- a

0.05 (0.05)

-

2.4

wlat95

9

0

5.71 **

0.05 (0.02)

-

-

2.4

wlat96

4

89

10.22 **

-

0.07 (0.02)

-

4.7

wlat96

9

0

6.91 **

0.05 (0.02)

-

-

3.0

wlat97

2

115

4.28 *

0.00 (0.03)

0.07 (0.05)

0.15 (0.05)

4.9

wlat97

4

89

6.22 **

-

0.06 (0.03)

-

2.7

wter95

3

45

5.42 **

-0.11 (0.03)

0.01 (0.03)

-0.01 (0.03)

6.6

wter95

4

89

5.56 **

-

0.06 (0.03)

-

2.4

wter95

9

5

7.11 **

0.07 (0.03)

-

-

3.1

wter96

4

89

7.45 **

-

0.07 (0.03)

-

3.3

wter96

15

5

3.62 *

0.01 (0.03)

-0.09 (0.04)

-0.09 (0.04)

4.0

wter97

8

55

4.19 *

-0.10 (0.03)

0.01 (0.04)

-0.03 (0.04)

4.8

wflu98

2

115

4.47 **

-0.05 (0.04)

0.09 (0.08)

0.28 (0.08)

5.2

wflu98

4

89

8.72 **

-

0.13 (0.02)

-

3.9

wflu98

9

50

5.02 *

0.10 (0.05)

-

-

2.1

wflu98

10

10

4.17 *

0.00 (0.05)

0.16 (0.05)

0.01 (0.05)

4.8


Oregon Site

Trait

LG

Map Position (cM)

F-value

Pat. Effect (Std. Error)

Mat. Effect (Std. Error)

Pat. X Mat. Effect (Std. Error)

Proportion Var. (%)

oflu98

7

31

4.00 *

-0.07 (0.09)

0.11 (0.09)

-0.31 (0.01)

9.7

oflu98

10

40

4.63**

-0.16 (0.14)

0.43 (0.14)

-0.09 (0.23)

11.5

oflu98

11

28

4.56 *

-

0.19 (0.09)

-

4.1

oflu98

12

11

4.55 **

0.78 (0.08)

-0.23 (0.08)

-0.05 (0.08)

11.2


* p < 0.01

** p < 0.005

a Markers on this linkage group provide information for only one parent. Regression is not ‘full rank’.
2 versus 0 QTLs

Table 5 Bud flush QTLs detected following 2 versus 0 QTL model. Linkage group (LG) and map position (cM) are presented for each QTL along with F-values, paternal and maternal effects, paternal x maternal interaction effects, and the proportion of total phenotypic variance explained by the QTL. Standard errors for effects are presented in parentheses. (See Table 1 for description of trait names.)

Washington Site

Trait

LG

Map position (cM)

F-value

Pat. Effect (Std. Error)

Mat. Effect (Std.Error)

Pat. X Mat. Effect (Std. Error)

Proportion var. (%)

wlat95

4

9

44

2.93 *

- a

-

-2.59 (1.08)

1.42 (0.59)

-

-

2.0

wlat95

6

18

53

3.36 **

-

-

-0.02 (0.01)

-0.05 (0.03)

-

-

1.2

wlat95

14

17

22

3.35 **

0.02 (0.01)

0.01 (0.01)

0.00 (0.01)

0.00 (0.01)

0.03 (0.01)

0.03 (0.01)

3.6

wlat96

2

20

115

3.05 *

-0.02 (0.03)

-0.02 (0.02)

-0.05 (0.02)

0.06 (0.04)

-0.03 (0.03)

0.09 (0.04)

6.1

wlat96

4

14

44

7.30 **

-

-

-3.19 (0.86)

1.90 (0.52)

-

-

6.2

wlat96

9

0

50

4.00 **

0.05 (0.02)

0.02 (0.02)

-

-

-

-

3.1

wlat97

2

10

115

3.23 **

-0.02 (0.04)

0.01 (0.02)

-0.06 (0.03)

0.10 (0.05)

-0.01 (0.04)

0.14 (0.05)

6.6

wlat97

4

9

44

3.21 *

-

-

-3.00 (1.18)

1.60 (0.65)

-

-

2.3

wlat97

7

11

16

2.91 *

0.03 (0.02)

0.03 (0.02)

0.00 (0.01)

0.00 (0.01)

-0.05 (0.02)

-0.06 (0.02)

2.9

wlat97

10

0

35

3.04 *

-0.02 (0.02)

-0.02 (0.02)

0.05 (0.02)

0.04 (0.02)

0.02 (0.03)

0.01 (0.02)

3.1

wter95

3

0

45

2.82 *

0.02 (0.02)

-0.11 (0.03)

0.02 (0.07)

0.00 (0.05)

0.02 (0.04)

-0.02 (0.04)

5.5

wter95

4

14

44

2.96 *

-

-

-2.58 (0.11)

1.56 (0.64)

-

-

2.0

wter95

9

0

50

4.55 **

0.05 (0.02)

0.04 (0.03)

-

-

-

-

3.6

wter96

4

9

44

4.29 **

-

-

-3.74 (1.28)

2.03 (0.70)

-

-

3.4

wter96

15

0

5

3.62 **

0.01 (0.01)

0.01 (0.02)

-0.04 (0.02)

-0.05 (0.02)

-0.04 (0.02)

-0.05 (0.02)

4.0

wter97

2

0

115

3.30 **

0.03 (0.05)

0.04 (0.03)

-0.09 (0.03)

0.09 (0.05)

0.02 (0.06)

0.13 (0.05)

6.8

wflu98

2

10

115

3.52 **

-0.01 (0.07)

-0.05 (0.04)

-0.11 (0.05)

0.14 (0.08)

-0.08 (0.08)

0.03 (0.08)

7.4

wflu98

4

9

44

6.20 **

-

-

-7.20 (2.11)

3.90 (1.15)

-

-

5.2

wflu98

9

0

50

3.74 **

0.07 (0.04)

0.09 (0.05)

-

-

-

-

2.8

wflu98

10

10

25

4.17 **

0.00 (0.03)

0.00 (0.02)

0.09 (0.03)

0.08 (0.02)

0.01 (0.03)

0.01 (0.02)

4.8


Oregon Site

Trait

LG

Map position (cM)

F value

Pat. Effect (Std. Error)

Mat. Effect (Std. Error)

Pat. X Mat. Effect (Std. Error)

Proportion var. (%)

oter96

4

14

29

2.89 *

-

-

0.03 (0.02)

0.04 (0.02)

-

-

2.4

oter96

15

0

5

3.34 *

-0.00 (0.01)

-0.00 (0.02)

0.03 (0.02)

0.03 (0.02)

-0.05 (0.02)

-0.07 (0.03)

8.4

oflu98

10

0

10

4.63 **

-0.05 (0.04)

-0.06 (0.05)

0.14 (0.04)

0.17 (0.05)

-0.02 (0.45)

-0.03 (0.07)

11.5

oflu98

12

26

31

2.86 *

0.14 (0.06)

0.12 (0.05)

-1.40 (0.65)

1.20 (0.64)

0.12 (0.90)

-0.27 (0.95)

10.0

* p < 0.01

** p < 0.005

a Markers on this linkage group provide information for only one parent. Regression is not ‘full rank’.
map figure featuring summary of spring bud flush QTL estimates
HOME | RESEARCH | PUBLICATIONS | STAFF | EMPLOYMENT